Nothing but tears for the unfulfilled hopes, dreams and expectations of all the victims of yet another senseless act of violence. Condolences and wishes for peace to all those parents, families and a community tragically ripped apart by yet another unfathomable and inexplicable event…
The fourth US mass shooting in the past year with a total of 54 men, women and children dead. Over the past few decades, there have been mass shootings in Australia, Azerbaijan, Canada, Norway, and the UK. And not even China has been immune – though their issue is mass knifing instead of shootings.
The airwaves, television screens and internet are all abuzz with stories and theories and recriminations and calls for action. Hasty exploitive interviews with family and children and neighbours and academics and psychologists and sociologists and criminologists are everywhere – each with their own agenda to provide meaningful insight, analysis and coverage. Special theme music, a CNN phenomenon in the post-Gulf War I era, litter the media landscape – as if this sad event needed any more to stress the poignancy.
And as always in the aftermath, the pundits offer their solutions to forever end these debacles. Whatever the discussion, we need to discuss the issues in the right frame – not misappropriate them for purpose of unrelated arguments on whatever topic we champion.
The biggest argument is the persistent criticism of the US gun culture and their Second Amendment – “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The sticking point is whether the person subscribes to the Individual Rights Theory or the Collective Rights Theory. Does it refer to the e individual’s right to own guns, or the State’s obligation to protect its citizens? There is no consensus.
Regardless, CNN reports that in 2009 there were over 310 million American non-military firearms for 305 million people – and shockingly, there were 11,500 “homicides by firearm” in the same year.
Using the 2009 ratios, proportionally Canada’s 33.7 million citizens would own 34.2 million firearms and commit 1270 firearm homicides. But for some reason we didn’t… in 2011 there were 7.9 million firearms, and in 2009 we had 179 deaths by shooting. The numbers are much less, but sadly they are not zero.
I do not believe that today’s society, one that makes money – legally and illegally – from handguns and long barrel guns, will ever cut shooting deaths to zero.
For the record, I am not a gun owner – never have been one, never want to be one. But, I do enjoy target shooting on occasion. I also understand that hunters love to hunt and do not begrudge them that. I am not against recreational shooting.
But I do believe that if you only have a hammer, then everything becomes a nail. If you carry a gun, you probably view everyone as a potential target. And if by chance an intruder into my house has a gun, I’d bet the chance of someone dying probably escalates exponentially if I introduced a second gun into the equation. I am not arguing whether the intruder “deserves” to face a gun…I am talkng about potential outcomes. I can only conclude that if I put “his already-morally-compromised back” against the wall, I just become a nail to be hammered. I know lots will disagree – but that’s just me; I simply poin to the Trayvor Martin/George Zimmerman episode in Florida this past summer.
Anyway, it’s a moot point: the US of A will never give up its guns. I acknowledge that.
But as offered by Nick Kristof in the New York Times, “…shooting is fun! But so is driving, and we accept that we must wear seat belts, use headlights at night, and fill out forms to buy a car. Why can’t we be equally adult about regulating guns?” Maybe that will be enough.
Enough about guns.
The other issue that needs to be addressed is the mental illness piece. There are so many viewpoints on this topic, too.
Here in Canada we have been trying hard to remove the stigma surrounding mental illness. It is an uphill battle. And rightly or wrongly, we all jump to the issue of mental illness as “rationalisation” for the atrocity – as if all mentally ill people will inevitably take up arms and slaughter innocents. That is not true. But, if that is how we brand them, it is no wonder that no one wants to admit to mental issues. But even if we identify the issue, finding help in this resource-constrained world is difficult.
The Anarchist Soccer Mom takes the issue head-on when she describes her son Michael. “I live with a son who is mentally ill. I love my son. But he terrifies me. A few weeks ago, Michael pulled a knife and threatened to kill me and then himself after I asked him to return his overdue library books. His 7- and 9-year-old siblings knew the safety plan—they ran to the car and locked the doors before I even asked them to. I managed to get the knife from Michael, then methodically collected all the sharp objects in the house into a single Tupperware container that now travels with me. Through it all, he continued to scream insults at me and threaten to kill or hurt me.”
She then goes on to discuss how her options are now limited after pharmaceuticals, therapy, psychiatry and law enforcement have been unable to control the problem effectively. Her fear is that he is on the same awful trajectory as all those who have killed others.
Her story offers a new perspective. It is not just about guns – though I am sure that we all agree that a person with mental illness without a gun, or a knife for that matter, is unlikely to commit such a crime of the same proportion.
It is time for a serious look at how we educate ourselves about mental illnes, and how we diagnose, respond, and treat those affected. It should be a high public health priority…
And lastly… I ask what is the media’s role in all this?
In a strange internet hoax, Morgan Freeman, is wrongly attributed for a pointed citicism against the media. It wasn’t him. But I wish the anonymous author would come forward. Their is merit in their words. Sensationalization, voyeurism, instant fame. Anonymous writes on why the shootings continue:
“You want to know why. This may sound cynical, but here’s why.
It’s because of the way the media reports it. Flip on the news and watch how we treat the Batman theater shooter and the Oregon mall shooter like celebrities. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris are household names, but do you know the name of a single *victim* of Columbine?
Disturbed people who would otherwise just off themselves in their basements see the news and want to top it by doing something worse, and going out in a memorable way. Why a grade school? Why children? Because he’ll be remembered as a horrible monster, instead of a sad nobody.
CNN’s article says that if the body count “holds up”, this will rank as the second deadliest shooting behind Virginia Tech, as if statistics somehow make one shooting worse than another. Then they post a video interview of third-graders for all the details of what they saw and heard while the shootings were happening. Fox News has plastered the killer’s face on all their reports for hours.
Any articles or news stories yet that focus on the victims and ignore the killer’s identity? None that I’ve seen yet. Because they don’t sell. So congratulations, sensationalist media, you’ve just lit the fire for someone to top this and knock off a day care center or a maternity ward next.
You can help by forgetting you ever read this man’s name, and remembering the name of at least one victim. You can help by donating to mental health research instead of pointing to gun control as the problem. You can help by turning off the news.”
Three different viewpoints on the same issue – all trying to learn from the Newtown shooting and to prevent the next one.
Just like we did after the Milwaukee Sikh Temple Shooting, Colorado’s Batman Cinema Shooting, the École Polytechqnique Shooting in Montréal, the Gifford Shooting Spree in Tucson, the Shooting at Fort Hood, the Virginia Tech Shooting, or the Columbine Massacre…and on and on.
Gun control? Mental Illness? The Media?
I don’t know which is to blame. And evidently people with a lot bigger brains are just as confused, otherwise this would be sorted. All I know is that we need to talk about all of them, how they interact, and then we need to sort it. Hearing and seeing adults, teenagers, children – male and female – die needlessly at the hands of executioners armed to the teeth is not an acceptable option. And I hope that our egos and our priorities can be altered to appropriately restrict a troubled person’s access to instruments that can kill – guns, knives, or whatever.
Some say, “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”. Okay, I can’t refute that. But surely we can also add a qualifier…”People with guns kill people.” A gun definitely makes it easier…
We have to take away the means (unregulated weapons), address the causes (mental illness, poverty…) and remove the incentive (infamy, notoriety, exposure…) for those who might be inclined to kill the innocent. If not, we will just continue the same superficial conversations – gnashing our teeth and crying our tears – over another series of senseless deaths.
And while I hope we can all take a moment to think of all those who have been gunned down during the simple act of living their lives innocently, please take an extra moment to remember the little children lost forever, and their protectors who died trying to save them. Offer what strength you can to their families and friends as they deal with indescribable pain and a despair that no one should ever have to deal with…
- Charlotte Bacon, 6;
- Daniel Barden, 7;
- Rachel Davino, 29;
- Olivia Engel, 6;
- Josephine Gay, 7;
- Ana Marquez-Greene, 6;
- Dylan Hockley, 6;
- Dawn Hochsprung, 47;
- Madeleine Hsu, 6;
- Catherine Hubbard, 6;
- Chase Kowalski, 7;
- Jesse Lewis, 6;
- James Mattioli, 6;
- Grace McDonnell, 7;
- Anne Marie Murphy, 52;
- Emilie Parker, 6;
- Jack Pinto, 6;
- Noah Pozner, 6;
- Caroline Previdi, 6;
- Jessica Rekos, 6;
- Avielle Richman, 6;
- Lauren Rousseau, 30;
- Mary Sherlach, 56;
- Victoria Soto, 27;
- Benjamin Wheeler, 6;
- Allison Wyatt, 6
Later,
ASF
5 responses to “Guns, Mental Illness and Infamy…”
Betsy MacAleese
December 17th, 2012 at 06:32
The Morgan Freeman quote should be attributed to some anonymous writer and not Mr. Freeman. A bit of a spoof to the web … though with such insight it’s kind of sad why someone would do that?
Also, the right to bear arms cannot explain assault guns .. that can mow down anything in it’s path. Hunting use? Hardly! So I’d love to hear the NRA (or anyone for that matter) justify their use in any sense for the average public.
Just a few thoughts … ….
asimplefellow
December 20th, 2012 at 09:36
Thanks for the input Betsy. This iteration of the debate seems to have more legs than the past. I hope that it gains traction…I agree. A Bushmaster AR15 has no place in “sport-shooting”. Waiting for the NRA to come back at the Gun Control in 2013 once they beleive the passion has dissipated. I hope this passion never does…
Betsy MacAleese
December 17th, 2012 at 06:34
Also a special thank you from me to the author for listing all of the names of the casualties. I will make it a point not only to remember them .. but forget who committed such a horrendous act. Who was it again? never mind … …
PJH
December 17th, 2012 at 06:38
Nicely written. I would remove the attribution to Morgan Freeman as I believe that was an internet hoax to expand circulation to a decent post.
asimplefellow
December 20th, 2012 at 09:32
Thanks Pat…corrected in the updated version. It was a good post from Anonymous. It did not need a fake attribution in my opinion.